Boulevard PV 01/10
Lucerne Valley Information Website
Lucerne Valley Community Calendar

Home
Up
 

 

LUCERNE VALLEY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION (LVEDA)

To: Doug Feremenga, Project Planner - Planning Division

From: Chuck Bell, Pres.
P. O. Box 193
Lucerne Valley, CA 92356 760 964 3118 chuckb@sisp.net

Date: 1/7/10

RE: BOULEVARD , LLC - NEXTERA – 60 MW PV - 453 091 72

Doug:

Some of this is repetition of our generic comments on all these applications – too many projects and too little time to adequately focus on each one.

LVEDA is not taking a final position on the project until the EIR (if required) is submitted. Whether we eventually support or oppose this project – an EIR might be avoided if mitigation suffices.

As expressed in our various comments on “renewable” energy projects – we advocate solar panel installations on roof tops and parking lots rather than spreading utility-scale developments throughout remote desert locations. The amount of land required for solar power generation relative to the energy produced is a marginal use of desert resources. Sunshine is only one of the desert’s many attributes.

Lucerne Valley is besieged with numerous solar/wind project proposals and applications: (This project – Rabbit Springs Solar – Strawberry Peak Solar - Granite Mt. Wind - Fry Mt. Wind – Chevron Solar – proposed PV sites near Camprock Rd. – Recurrent Energy’s 2 PVsites “somewhere near” Hwy 18 – a massive PV array in and around Lucerne Dry Lake? – who knows what else?.). Plus SCE’s proposed “Jasper Substation” to accommodate Granite Mt. Wind’s power connection “and other projects – don’t know where” (per SCE). Plus the proposed 29 Palms Marine Base expansion into Johnson and Lucerne Valleys. Plus LADWP’s Green Path North transmission line (which ISN’T dead). These piece-meal projects are flowing in – one after the other – prior to finalization of the so-called “regional” BLM Programmatic process/RETI/etc., etc. plans – literally the “cart before the horse” – committing sites and associated future transmission links from who knows where - before we “all” figure out the best places for them. Whether the County requires an “Energy Overlay” for these “renewables” or not – the fact remains that build-out of even just a few of these plants will significantly trump the integrity of our Community Plan that we and the County worked so hard to produce – not to mention the inevitable land-use conflicts on the ground. A CUMULATIVE IMPACT ANALYSIS IS CRITICAL TO ASSESS IMPLICATIONS TO OUR LAND-USE CONFIGURATIONS..
Notwithstanding our concerns re: utility-scale projects, this project basically complies with our general policy of utilizing previously disturbed private parcels with existing roads, infrastructure, etc. – offering land-owners the opportunity to market properties that are not likely suitable for other types of development – as an alternative to consuming what’s left of undisturbed public lands – subsidized by taxpayers and public land users.

Dust/sand-blow control would be critical and must be closely monitored – especially with a 30 month construction period.

Bonding to assure site reclamation if and when project is abandoned. Need to assess community economic implications – particularly what happens if and when projects are abandoned due to new technologies or cessation of subsidies

Construction vehicle access to the site (assuming eastbound from Hwy 18 – north on Hwy 247 – Barstow Rd.) will adversely affect traffic flow through the Lucerne Valley commercial corridor. If 2 or 3 of these solar plants start construction at the same time – cumulative traffic impacts will be more than “significant”.

Paving improvements on Haynes and Meridian Roads should be required – offering some compensating benefit to local residents.

If PVs constitute a “heat sink” – quantify increase in localized temperatures.

Consider natural or fence-type screening for surrounding residences if so requested.

Groundwater in that area can be of marginal quality – OK for construction – likely not for panel washing unless filtered. Impact on local wells must be assessed.

Our local labor force must be utilized to the maximum extent possible for construction and operation. The community would not appreciate the import of workers and construction equipment – ignoring our varied and professional resources that can perform numerous tasks.

LOCAL RESIDENTS DIRECTLY AFFECTED BY THE PROJECT HAVE SUBMITTED SPECIFIC AND PERTINENT COMMENTS/CONCERNS THAT MUST BE ADDRESSED.



 

Home ] Up ]

Send mail to webmaster@sisp.net with questions or comments about this web site.
Copyright © 2010 Lucerne Valley Community Information
Last modified: 06/04/11